Site Meter

Pages 373 and 374

You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Pages 373 and 374”.

16 Comments

A few corrections. Page 373:
– Panel 4, “being violate” -> “being violated”.
Page 374:
– Panels 1 & 2, “chickens”.
– Panel 5, “interested on” -> “interested in”, “I will just” -> “I would just”.

Awesome pages! This guy has very special ideas about justice.

[Reply]

Raul Trevino Reply:

Great, I fixed it! Thanks a lot!
Yeah this guy is … special.

[Reply]


Is that supposed to say “Oh my Dog” or “Oh My God” in panel 5?

[Reply]

Raul Trevino Reply:

Hahaha, it’s intentional. Sounds funny to me … Is it common in US?

[Reply]

Austin Reply:

Well…Most people in the US go “OH MY GOD” when they cannot believe there Luck, whether positive or negative. It’s pretty much asking why God has been so king/ cruel to you. Going “OH MY DOG” pretty much has the same effect but it is asking your pet why your have this luck. WELCOME TO THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, IT MAKES NO SENSE AT ALL!

[Reply]


King Queer is so awesome! Go, go, go King Queer! :-D

Oh… Is it a bit too late for that now? Perhaps I shouldn’t cheer on a guy as he’s cutting off the head of a minor with the intention of later violating that head? ;-)

[Reply]


5th panel from the end- ckicken should be chicken.

Not sure about “That’s what it claims” in the 4th panel from the end… maybe intentional, but it doesn’t quite make sense to me.

[Reply]


“Oh my dog” is very unusual English – but this is King Queer. I was actually pretty certain it WASN’T a mistake!

“That’s what ‘it’ says.” What WHAT says? I don’t recall anything offhand WRT an agreement between King Queer and Splitter (not that it wouldn’t get lost in the shuffle, but something about that seems like it would stick.)

Backstory, please!

[Reply]

Raul Trevino Reply:

Sure thing! Here is the backstory: http://coolchickens.com/en/archive/page-25/

[Reply]

JKelley Reply:

Ah – makes sense, now!

[Reply]


Oh – and in the second-from-last panel, it should probably be “… and gets away.” “… and goes away” doesn’t quite work in that sentence (it was close enough that I had to look again…)

[Reply]


Gah – same panel, “You had YOUR chance,” not “you had the chance.”

I know, I’m being pedantic. I write technical books, precision is important to me…

Anyhow, I THINK that’s the last of it.

Now, what has Chapi noticed…?

[Reply]


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin